Commentary on van der Maas et al . (2017): Going where the action is

Clinician's Commentary on van der Spuy et al.1

Admissions to health professional programmes are highly competitive; thus, programmes seek to ensure that they are extending offers of admission to candidates who best exemplify the profile of their profession. Considering applicants involves a multiple-sampling process that includes assessing academic ability, personal statements, interviews, and references. The standard for assessing academic...

A comment on van der Vorst et al. (2010).

article on adolescent drinking, van der Vorst and colleagues (2010) made recommendations for policy and parenting that are unsupported by their own data and are, I would argue, potentially harmful. The article was presented as a refutation of the idea that parents should model moderate/mealtime drinking for their adolescent offspring (as by permitting the adolescent a few sips of an alcoholic b...

Ethics and autism: where is the autistic voice? Commentary on Post et al.

Commentary Commentary on Ullman et al

Ullman and colleagues should be congratulated for an energetic assault on some of the core issues in neurolinguistics. This work attempts to detect an impact of productivity differences in morphology upon fluency differences in aphasia. This basic goal is well-motivated empirically and should eventually succeed. However, I believe that the links currently being proposed between language and the...

Commentary on Generoso et al

Commentary on “Improving the seasonal cycle and interannual variations of biomass burning aerosol sources” by Generoso et al. L. Giglio and J. D. Kendall Science Systems and Applications, Inc., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 923, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA Received: 21 October 2003 – Accepted: 26 November 2003 – Published: 27 November 2003 Correspondence to: L. Giglio ([email protected]...